Research · Published
Privacy Boundary Mapping for Assistant Work
A privacy boundary map shows which information an assistant needs, where it lives, and when an owner must intervene.
On this page
Headline signal
3 boundary fields: information, access, intervention (FTC Data Security Guidance). Treat this as context for planning, not a guarantee about a particular assistant or operating result.
Analysis and operating context
Methodology: the map separates information handled, access required, and intervention triggers. It is intended to make a support role understandable before permissions are granted.
Classify the information as ordinary business material, personal information, customer content, or a higher-risk record under the company’s policy. Then identify the smallest system and action needed.
Write stop conditions for requests involving identity, payment, legal matters, account recovery, or unusual disclosure. The assistant should route those cases with context rather than decide them.
Review the map when a tool, data field, or customer interaction changes. Remove unused access and keep a named owner responsible for exceptions and offboarding.
Sources
- NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
- NIST Digital Identity Guidelines
- CISA Secure Our World
- FTC Data Security Guidance
- Google Search Central: Creating helpful content
- Google Search Central: SEO starter guide
- OWASP Top 10
- ILO: Decent work and the care economy
- World Bank: Digital economy
- Philippine Statistics Authority
- W3C Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
Frequently asked questions
What should a manager verify first?
Verify the work definition, source record, reviewer, access limit, and escalation path before assigning the queue.
What belongs with the internal owner?
Keep final approvals, unusual exceptions, payment decisions, and changes to the control rules with the internal owner.